Search Results

In an increasingly interconnected digital world, cyber threats have become more sophisticated, persistent, and potentially devastating. As organizations strive to protect their critical assets and sensitive information, a robust cybersecurity strategy is of greatest importance. The fusion of Zero Trust principles with Swiss Cyber Security practices offers a comprehensive solution to mitigate these evolving threats. Zero Trust: A Paradigm Shift in Cybersecurity Zero Trust is not just a security framework; it's a paradigm shift. Traditional security models that rely on the perimeter defense strategy are no longer sufficient to combat today's advanced cyber threats. Zero Trust is built on the premise that no entity, whether inside or outside the network, should be inherently trusted. Trust must be continuously verified and never assumed. Core Principles of Zero Trust Zero Trust security architecture operates on several key principles: Verify Identity: Every user, device, and application attempting to access the network must be authenticated, ensuring that they are who they claim to be. Least Privilege Access: Users and devices are granted the minimum access necessary to perform their tasks, reducing the potential attack surface. Micro-Segmentation: Networks are divided into smaller segments to limit lateral movement within the network if a breach occurs. Continuous Monitoring: Ongoing monitoring of network activity ensures that any anomalous behavior is detected promptly. Swiss Cyber Security: A Tradition of Excellence Switzerland has a long-standing reputation for maintaining a strong commitment to data privacy and security. Its Cyber Security landscape is no exception. Key Features of Swiss Cyber Security Data Privacy: Switzerland boasts rigid data privacy laws, including the new Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) and adherence to EU GDPR standards. This ensures that customer data remains highly secure and private. Proactive Threat Intelligence: Swiss cybersecurity firms continually invest in threat intelligence to stay ahead of emerging threats, making them well-equipped to safeguard their clients' interests. Innovative Technology: Swiss cybersecurity solutions harness the latest technology, providing clients with advanced security options, including encryption, advanced authentication, and intrusion detection systems. The Synergy: Zero Trust in the Swiss Context Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is a fundamental component of the Zero Trust framework. It establishes rigid access controls, allowing organizations to grant or deny access to specific applications or data based on user identity, device health, and real-time security posture. ZTNA aligns perfectly with Swiss Cyber Security practices, which prioritize the protection of sensitive data and user privacy. Continuous Monitoring and Anomaly Detection Both Zero Trust and Swiss Cyber Security emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and anomaly detection. Swiss cybersecurity firms have adopted advanced AI and machine learning solutions to monitor network activity in real-time, just as Zero Trust encourages. Adaptive Authentication Zero Trust incorporates adaptive authentication, which evaluates various factors, such as the user's behavior and device health, before granting access. Swiss Cyber Security firms have also adopted this approach, enhancing security by using multiple factors for identity verification. Implementing Zero Trust in Swiss organizations The implementation of Zero Trust principles within the Swiss Cyber Security landscape can be highly effective in safeguarding an organization's critical assets. Here's how: Access Control Policies: Swiss firms can incorporate Zero Trust principles by adopting granular access controls, ensuring that users and devices are granted the minimum required access, as per the least privilege principle. Identity Verification: Robust identity verification, including multi-factor authentication and adaptive authentication, can be integrated to strengthen security measures. Continuous Monitoring: Swiss cybersecurity companies can reinforce their security solutions by enhancing real-time monitoring for anomalous behavior. Case Studies: Real-World Applications Banking and Finance The banking and financial sector in Switzerland, known for its security and confidentiality, can further bolster its defenses with Zero Trust. Zero Trust principles align seamlessly with the sector's strict regulatory requirements and data privacy commitments. Healthcare The healthcare industry faces numerous challenges in safeguarding patient data. Swiss healthcare organizations can benefit from the continuous monitoring and robust access controls provided by the Zero Trust framework. Government Institutions Swiss government institutions can enhance their security posture by adopting Zero Trust principles to protect sensitive information, critical infrastructure, and the privacy of citizens. Challenges and Considerations Implementing Zero Trust in the Swiss Cyber Security landscape is not without its challenges: Integration Complexity: Migrating to a Zero Trust architecture may be complex for some Swiss organizations, particularly those with legacy systems. Resource Requirements: Zero Trust may demand a significant investment in terms of technology, personnel, and training. Cultural Shift: Shifting from traditional security models to a Zero Trust paradigm requires a change in mindset and a strong commitment to continuous verification. The marriage of Zero Trust principles and Swiss Cyber Security practices provides a powerful combination to combat the evolving landscape of cyber threats. The stringent data privacy laws, advanced technology, and commitment to excellence in Switzerland make it an ideal environment to implement Zero Trust. As organizations in Switzerland and beyond adapt to a digital world filled with uncertainties, a proactive approach to cybersecurity, combining Zero Trust and Swiss Cyber Security, becomes a strategic imperative. The synergy of these two approaches empowers organizations to protect their critical assets, secure sensitive information, and maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data in an ever-changing digital landscape. Premrn Security offers professional support on your path to implementing a Zero Trust security model. Our team of cybersecurity experts is dedicated to ensuring the protection of your sensitive data and enhancing your organization's security posture against highly advanced threats. Take proactive steps now; contact us today to secure your future.

Lately, cyber-attacks are successful due to one or more reasons but in most cases, reasons are either unpatched systems or holes in the configuration of IT systems, especially Active Directory (AD) and Azure Active Directory (AAD). In this article we will outline why vulnerability management procedures play a crucial role in securing organizations, how we can successfully detect vulnerabilities and how we can assess security posture of our organization. Change in Vulnerability Management Every week we read about new vulnerabilities but the most important thing which has changed in the last years is that vulnerabilities which are publicly known are already most likely being exploited for some months. A very well-known example is Hafnium attack which exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange server, but there are also many others like CVE-2022-22965 (Spring4Shell). The Chinese state-sponsored threat group started exploiting vulnerabilities in Exchange servers in January 2021, but vulnerabilities were publicly disclosed in March 2021 when Microsoft also released security updates and mitigation guidelines. The Hafnium attack targeted Exchange servers opened to internet via Outlook Web Access (OWA). Even though Microsoft released security update it did not help in case your organization was one of 21’000 which were believed to be affected. Due to a change in the timeline of vulnerability exploitation, public disclosure and mitigation/patch, organizations must have a well-developed vulnerability management procedure so they are able to identify all vulnerabilities on their systems, including IoT and network devices, a threat hunting team which can find artifacts of already exploited vulnerabilities and a comprehensive incident response plan, so damage to organization can be limited and systems can be restored. Guidelines for Vulnerability Management program To find and remediate vulnerabilities in the environment organizations must have a developed vulnerability management process. The process must include all steps – identification, classification/risk evaluation and remediation. Vulnerabilities can be most easily identified using a dedicated Vulnerability Assessment (VA) solution such as Tenable or Rapid7 or leverage the Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) solution such as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint or Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR. When deciding which approach to take organizations must consider that all devices must be scanned, including network and IoT devices which do not support agent installation but must be scanned using credential or uncredentialed scanning techniques. Once vulnerabilities are identified they will automatically have a CVSS score assigned. The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) score shows criticality of specific vulnerability. It is composed of multiple metrics such as access requirement of exploitation, complexity, required privileges, user interaction, scope of impact, … More information about CVSS scoring can be found on the following NIST website. After vulnerabilities are classified, each organization must assess the vulnerabilities’ impact on the environment. Results of this step will also impact the remediation process of each vulnerability. To assess the vulnerability’s impact organizations must verify which systems are impacted, how those systems are protected, are there already full or partial controls in place which prevent exploitation of vulnerability and what impact successful exploitation of the vulnerability might have on the organization. The last step of vulnerability management is remediation, which can be done in multiple ways such as patching, host isolation or implementation of other controls like firewall rules. Remediation process will defer based on the system’s version, criticality of vulnerability, potential patching impact on organization and internal patching policies. For example, some companies patch devices only once per month if for example extensive tests are needed for each patch, and in case vulnerabilities are discovered between pathing days they must be mitigated using other controls. If the system is out-of-support or has components which require vulnerable version of software to be installed one of the best ways to remediate threat is to isolate the system and look for replacement. Remediation part of vulnerability management usually includes collaboration between applications/deployment and cyber security team. The collaboration process must be simple and well defined, so each party knows the responsibilities. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) for example offers an integration with Microsoft Endpoint Manager (MEM) so that when a vulnerability is found cyber security team can easily send a request for patching to applications/deployment team with a vulnerability explanation and comment. This integration allows teams to be agile and collaborate in a quick and efficient way. Determining Cyber Security posture of organization The second most common reason for a successful breach is misconfigurations in systems, especially the domain itself. The most common reasons for misconfigurations are complexity of IT environments, as they include multiple systems, platforms and applications which need to be integrated, configured correctly and up-to-date, human error, lack of standardization between regions or sites company has, struggle with keeping up with the latest development and insufficient testing of configurations. Misconfigurations are most often not immediately apparent as there are no indicators in IT environments about them and in case organizations do not perform assessments of environments, misconfigurations can stay hidden for a long time and introduce unknown additional risk. To keep IT environment in an optimal state, assessments must be performed continuously, multiple times per year. We see misconfigurations as a big risk, that is why we suggest organizations to regularly assess environments and we also offer a free security assessment. Assessment of environment can either be done using custom scripts or by leveraging professional solutions such as Ping Castle or Purple Knight. On the other hand, customers which have already implemented Microsoft security solutions such as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Identity or Microsoft Defender for Cloud already receive a good assessment of the environment as part of Secure score and recommendations Microsoft provides to customers. Once misconfigurations are identified organizations must prepare plans to mitigate them. Mitigation of some misconfigurations such as Kerberos Unconstrained delegation can be challenging as many organizations have old systems which were setup by previous employees and are often not documented. Changing delegation setting might also have a big effect on availability of systems in the environment. Because of challenges which might arise it is recommended to ask a professional for some advice instead of changing configuration without knowing potential effects. Keeping environment secure with a developed vulnerability management program can be challenging. Besides that, organizations must also assess configurations of systems deployed and improve it in case issues are identified. In case you need assistance with developing vulnerability management program or are interested in seeing the security posture of your environment, reach out to Premrn Security, and our experts will help you.

In the realm of cybersecurity, the development of a comprehensive plan or roadmap is crucial. This plan should encompass technical solutions, incident response protocols, and the human element. Prior to initiating the plan, one must be aware of the various solutions, software, processes, activities, and risks present in their environment. To build a cybersecurity roadmap from scratch, the first step is to gather information about the environment. This can be done in several ways, depending on the organization's size, structure, and IT capabilities. Typically, organizations obtain the necessary information by communicating with different departments, utilizing Windows Event Log/Syslog, running scripts, and generating reports. Another option is to leverage an Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) solution, such as Crowdstrike, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, or Sentinel One, which has to be deployed on most endpoint devices in order to collect viable information. This approach ensures the devices are secure while also providing a list of all installed software, along with versions and vulnerabilities. Smaller and mid-sized organizations that are not widely dispersed and have simple and fast communication between sites typically use the first approach. In contrast, larger organizations that have already deployed an EDR solution may opt for the latter since they have to collect information from different regions, which can be challenging due to bandwidth restrictions, satellite links, and time zone differences. The information collected by an EDR solution is sent directly to the cloud instead of being forwarded to a central location, and the data upload is optimized to minimize congestion, especially in satellite links. Once the required information is collected using an EDR solution, the information only needs to be confirmed by the sites. The development of a cybersecurity plan that ensures security and visibility across all areas of IT, including communication (email, MS Teams, Cisco Webex, Slack, etc.), servers and workstations, identities, cloud resources, and SaaS applications, must be developed as a single, symbiotic solution for the next three years. CISOs and IT security teams must consider the usability of the proposed solutions, their integration into the environment and with each other, their impact on current operational processes and employees, the knowledge required to deploy and manage the solutions, and who will monitor the environment. Failure to follow these guidelines may result in the deployment of suboptimal solutions that do not work together symbiotically, leading to additional expenses. Another critical aspect of cybersecurity that must be addressed simultaneously is the preparation of an incident response plan and team. Organizations must have a well-defined process for incident detection and response, including regular reviews of incidents generated by security tools or reported by an external Security Operation Center (SOC), threat hunting, and tabletop exercises to test the plan's effectiveness. The incident response team must have clear roles and responsibilities and be trained to handle incidents effectively. The third area of cybersecurity that is often overlooked is the human element and management. Cybersecurity is not just an IT issue; it is a business issue. The importance of cybersecurity needs to be communicated to management and all employees. Security awareness training should be provided to all employees to help them understand their role in maintaining the organization's security. Management plays a critical role in ensuring that cybersecurity is taken seriously within the organization by providing the necessary resources and support to the IT department to deploy the right security solutions and ensure that processes are in place to detect and respond to incidents. They must also ensure that cybersecurity is part of the overall business strategy. In conclusion, cybersecurity comprises several pillars: IT solutions, people, and leadership that must work together to create a well-secured environment. IT departments must develop a cybersecurity roadmap and incident response plan through a combination of tools, processes, and people. Management plays a crucial role in ensuring that cybersecurity is taken seriously within the organization, and everyone within the organization has a role to play in maintaining the organization's security.

Windows Firewall is a crucial Windows feature that is often neglected and only looked at when additional ports need to be opened for new software. However, the recent Outlook vulnerability (CVE-2023-23397) highlighted that relying solely on network firewalls for protection can be risky, as assessing and configuring the hundreds of network firewalls in an organization can be a challenging task. In this article, we will discuss the importance of Windows Firewall and how organizations can leverage it to create a robust first line of defense. Default configuration By default, Windows Firewall assumes that threats to an organization originate externally, and thus blocks connections to Windows devices unless they are specifically permitted, while outgoing connections are permitted unless they are specifically blocked. However, in the case of CVE-2023-23397, a malicious email downloaded to Outlook creates a TCP/445 connection from the device to the attacker’s server, which originates from the device itself and is not blocked by Windows Firewall by default. This is just one example of how attackers can exploit default Windows Firewall configurations, emphasizing the need for cybersecurity engineers to be familiar with and harden Windows Firewall configurations. What Windows Firewall offers Windows Firewall allows us to configure rules for specific Programs/Services using Protocol type and Port number, a combination of both, or predefined rules. During rule creation, we can also specify which IP destinations are included or excluded from the rule, allowing us to limit communication to a specific group of devices, among other things. Mitigating CVE-2023-23397 Focusing on securing the Domain profile in Windows Firewall, by default, a firewall rule called Core Networking - Group Policy (NP-Out) allows TCP/445 connections to any destination, relying on traditional network firewalls to secure the perimeter. However, a quick and easy solution is to modify the rule so that SMB connections are only allowed to networks containing domain controllers, file servers, and printing infrastructure. After doing so, configure the domain profile of Windows Firewall to block all outgoing connections, keeping in mind that there is no default rule to allow outgoing ICMP traffic. Conclusion In conclusion, this article has highlighted the importance and impact of Windows Firewall, a feature that offers many features often overlooked by organizations. Hardening Windows Firewall configurations can be challenging, especially in environments with many applications, but the benefits of doing so can be immense. Windows Firewall can serve as a strong first line of defense in a cybersecurity strategy, and organizations should take advantage of its capabilities to enhance their overall security posture.

Cyber-attacks are a growing threat in today's world and are becoming increasingly prevalent. As the saying goes in the cybersecurity community, "There are those who have been hacked and those who will be." When I ask individuals if they are worried about being hacked, around 75% respond with, "Why would a hacker target me? I don't have anything valuable to hide." This apathetic attitude prompted me to write this article, in which I aim to shed light on the motivations behind hacking, the different types of hackers, and the profits they can earn. Hackers can be divided into several categories based on their goals and motivations. The most dangerous and skilled group is known as "Nation-State Actors." These hackers are financially supported by governments, mainly the United States, Russia, China, and North Korea, and have nearly unlimited resources and time. Their primary goals are espionage and cyber warfare. Many of their attacks garner widespread media attention due to their large-scale impact. A prime example of a nation-state actors' attack is the SolarWinds hack in 2020, which targeted multiple US government agencies. Their targets are typically government agencies, electrical grid systems, power plants, and companies that work with the government as software or hardware vendors or consultants. The next group is cybercriminals, whose primary motivation is financial gain. Cybercrime is the largest area of hacking, as many individuals turn to hacking as a means to quickly make money. The most common type of attack performed by these groups is ransomware with extortion. They have moderate to high resources and knowledge and can cause significant damage to their targets. Their targets are organizations that hold valuable data, such as airlines, banks, IT companies, and hospitals. The final two groups are "Hactivists" and "Script Kiddies." Both groups have low to moderate resources and knowledge. Hactivists are hackers who engage in cybercrime for ideological or religious reasons. Their attacks often take the form of fake news, denial of service, and ransomware. Script Kiddies are inexperienced hackers who use programs and malware they find online to hone their skills. They are usually young individuals, often teenagers, who hack for fun or to show off to their peers. Their hacks include stealing Wi-Fi passwords and college exams. Now that we understand the different types of hackers, let's delve into the value of the data they steal. Credit card information is a commonly stolen item. Most credit card theft occurs on fake websites that trick individuals into entering their credit card information. The value of stolen credit cards on the black market ranges from $5 to $110 per card. Online payment services, such as PayPal, are also frequently stolen. These thefts occur by tricking individuals into entering their credentials on fake websites or by using credentials obtained from other hacked accounts, such as Facebook or email. The value of an online payment service account can be as high as $200. Gmail accounts are also valuable to cybercriminals and are sold for around $156 each. Many individuals reuse their email credentials, making Gmail accounts easy targets. Healthcare organizations are also frequent targets of cyberattacks. Cybercriminals are seeking protected health information (PHI) in these attacks. Stealing PHI is more lucrative than stealing credit cards, as healthcare organizations lack advanced fraud detection systems, and PHI provides much more personal information than a credit card. By using PHI, cybercriminals can commit health insurance fraud, illegally obtain prescription drugs and medical equipment, and create fake identities and passports that can be sold for a significant profit. As a result, PHI can be worth up to $1000 per piece. The most lucrative venture for cybercriminals is ransomware, hence why these types of attacks are becoming increasingly prevalent. Ransomware is a tactic employed by cybercriminals where they scramble your data, sometimes even stealing it, and then demand a ransom payment in exchange for the decryption key. A successful ransomware attack on a medium-sized company can net the attacker a payout of up to $300,000. Now that we have a better understanding of why cybercriminals engage in these actions and the value they place on our personal information, we must become more vigilant and protect ourselves against potential attacks. Our expert cyber security team is here to help you safeguard your personal information or secure your organization against these threats. Don't wait until it's too late, reach out to us today.

In today's digital world, the threat landscape is constantly evolving and organizations are facing new and sophisticated cyber threats every day. In order to protect sensitive information and systems, it's crucial to adopt a comprehensive approach to cybersecurity. That's where zero trust comes in. Zero trust is a security model that assumes that all devices and users are potential threats, regardless of their location or whether they are inside or outside the network. Instead of relying on perimeter-based security measures, zero trust verifies the identity and behavior of users and devices before granting access to sensitive resources. The importance of zero trust lies in the fact that traditional security models are no longer effective in protecting organizations from modern cyber threats. Perimeter-based security assumes that all devices inside the network are trusted and that the network perimeter provides enough security. However, with the rise of remote work and the increasing use of cloud-based services, the network perimeter has become porous, making it easier for attackers to penetrate the network. One of the key components of zero trust is continuous monitoring and verification. Zero trust solutions are designed to monitor user and device behavior and assess their risk level in real-time. This allows organizations to detect and respond to potential threats quickly, even if they are already inside the network. The implementation of zero trust requires a significant shift in an organization's security culture and requires a change in the way they approach security. It requires organizations to adopt a risk-based approach to security, where the risk level of each user and device is assessed before granting access to sensitive resources. If the risk level is higher than the threshold access to sensitive recourses is not given. The challenges encountered in implementing zero trust include the need for increased visibility and control, the need for better identity and access management, and the need for continuous monitoring and verification. These challenges can be addressed by adopting a multi-layered security approach, which combines various security solutions such as XDR systems, identity protection mechanisms, MFA and UEBA protection to provide comprehensive coverage. One of the important challenges encountered by organizations is management, education, and willingness of users to adopt zero trust concept. The first barrier is usually the implementation of MFA to users which do not own a company phone as many of them do not want to install an authenticator application to their private phone or to use a private phone number to receive SMS messages. In most cases this behavior/response is a leverage to receive a company phone. If an organization cannot afford or is not willing to issue mobile phones to all employees a good alternative is to hand out physical security keys for MFA authentication. In conclusion, zero trust is a crucial step in achieving comprehensive cybersecurity. By adopting a zero-trust approach, organizations can protect their sensitive information and systems from modern cyber threats, increase their visibility and control, and ensure the security of their users and devices. Whether you're just starting your journey or are already on the path to zero trust, working with an experienced security consultant can help you achieve your security goals and stay ahead of the threat landscape.